英國(guó)人是怎么寫雅思小作文的？英式思維大不一樣

很多同學(xué)可能對(duì)雅思小作文不太重視，甚至是對(duì)小作文根本不加練習(xí)，只關(guān)注大作文。

這是一個(gè)誤區(qū)，因?yàn)樵谠u(píng)分中小作文畢竟有一定的比重，而且，小作文的寫法掌握起來(lái)也并不是特別難，所以還是應(yīng)該把小作文的分?jǐn)?shù)把握好。

一起來(lái)看看英國(guó)人怎么寫小作文的呢?

題目解析

Some people think the best way to solve traffic congestions in cities is to provide free public transport 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

思路解析

一些人認(rèn)為在城市中解決交通擁堵的最好方法是提供每天 24 小時(shí),每周 7 天的免費(fèi)公交,你是否同意?

本題屬于社會(huì)類的正反討論題,需要考生討論提供全天免費(fèi)公交這一措施給 社會(huì)帶來(lái)的優(yōu)點(diǎn)與缺點(diǎn)。

本題需要注意的是優(yōu)點(diǎn)分析時(shí)需要圍繞解決交通擁堵問題展開討論,而非單純對(duì)于免費(fèi)公交本身的好處進(jìn)行分析。

觀點(diǎn) 1:優(yōu)點(diǎn)分析

1. 免費(fèi)公交能夠使很多人選擇綠色出行方式,因?yàn)榇蠖鄶?shù)人都會(huì)考慮出行成本

2. 免費(fèi)公交會(huì)使一些人放棄購(gòu)買私家車的計(jì)劃,減少機(jī)動(dòng)車擁有率

觀點(diǎn) 2:缺點(diǎn)分析

1. 政府需要大量撥款去支持該項(xiàng)目,造成政府和納稅人的負(fù)擔(dān)

2. 乘客人數(shù)暴漲,現(xiàn)有交通設(shè)施無(wú)法承受,容易引發(fā)事故

3. 促使很多本不必要的外出,浪費(fèi)能源和交通資源

相關(guān)詞匯

• traffic block 交通擁堵
• relieve 減輕
• fossil fuel 化石能源
• private car 私家車
• ownership 擁有率
• utilization rate 使用率
• passenger flow 客流
• traffic paralysis 交通癱瘓
• financial burden 財(cái)政負(fù)擔(dān)
• all-rounded 全面的
• by-effects 副作用
• car-purchasing tax 購(gòu)車稅
• congestion fee 擁堵費(fèi)
• travelling cost 出行成本

參考范文

Traffic congestion has become one of the most perturbing issues of modern society. A number of measures are being enacted to address such problem, someone claims that a whole day (24 hours) free public transportation system is a decent idea, while this is not the case.

There is no denying that this method, to a certain extent, could relieve the serious traffic pressure. Due to the soaring price of fossil fuel,the appearance of the free public transportation would enable most people to no longer prefer to drive their private cars considering the travelling cost.Additionally,if the urban public transportation system is convenient enough,the number of people who would like to purchase a private automobile will decrease significantly.Hence,this policy could effectively control the ownership and the utilization rate of automobile thereby alleviating the traffic block.

However, the image will be extremely different if people switch their perspective since this measure would bring a series of negative influence.The decreasing utilization rate of private cars means the increasing pressure of public transportation simultaneously. In the context of such situation,it is hard for the current facilities to bear the soaring passenger flow,it may cause not only the paralysis of the whole system, but also growing numbers of traffic accidents.

Moreover,to maintain the operation of public transportation system,government has to provide those related companies with more subsidies.For short-term development, it will bring government heavier financial burden,and what is worse, in the long run,the development of various other social areas including education, social welfare and technological research will be negatively affected since the funding allocated to these sectors will be cut,which will inevitably prevent the all-rounded social advancement.

In summary, even though this suggestion could enhance the traffic circumstances, while, considering its by-effects above, several other schemes might be regarded as better options comprising levying higher car-purchasing tax or congestion fee during rush hours